SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 1142

COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
KOPEKS HOLDINGS SDN BHD V.BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BERHAD


Table of Content
1. overview of the appellant's investment and claims. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. conditions precedent and respondent's contingent offer. (Para 7 , 8)
3. trial judge's findings on agreement negotiations. (Para 9 , 10)

[1] The appellant, the plaintiff in the court below is an investment subsidiary company of Koperasi Pekerja - Pekerja Kerajaan Sabah Berhad, a co - operative registered under the Co - Operative Societies Act 1993. The appellant claims against the respondent bank losses it says it suffered as a result of the wrongful withdrawal of banking facilities by the respondent in breach of a purported agreement. The issue before the learned trial judge is whether there exists a legally binding agreement between the appellant and the respondent. It is the appellant's contention that there was a legally binding agreement between the parties upon the appellant's acceptance of the respondent's offer of banking facilities. The learned trial judge found that the intention of the parties is not to make a concluded bargain unless and until a formal contract is executed and dismissed the appellant's claim with costs. Having considered the submissions and the appeal r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top