SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1268

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
HAJI RAIMI ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
SITI HASNAH VANGARAMA ABDULLAH & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of appeals and questions of law. (Para 1 , 1 , 2)
2. details of the plaintiff's background and family conversion to islam. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. information on plaintiff's early life and actions taken regarding her conversion. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. defendants' response and action to strike out plaintiff's originating summons. (Para 11 , 12)
5. court of appeal's decision and reasoning. (Para 13 , 14)

[1] There are two appeals before us namely, Civil Appeal No: 01(i)-8-04- 2013(P) and Civil Appeal No: 01(i)-9-04-2013(P) against the decision of the Court of Appeal dated 12 January 2012 which allowed the respondent's appeal against the decision of the High Court dated 4 August 2010. This Court had on 25 March 2013 granted the appellants' leave to appeal on the following questions of law:

(i) whether the Civil or the Syariah Court has the jurisdiction to determine whether a person professes Islam or not; and

(ii) whether the Civil Court has the jurisdiction to determine the validity of the conversion to Islam of a minor.

[2] In this judgment, the appellant in Civil Appeal No: 01(i)-8-04-2013(P) will be referred to as the 2nd defendant, with the appellant in Civi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top