SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1857

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
PETRODAR OPERATING CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
NAM FATT CORPORATION BERHAD & ANOR & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of the appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. summary of factual background (Para 5)
3. high court's decisions and reasoning (Para 6 , 7)
4. court of appeal's affirmation of the high court (Para 8 , 9)

[1] There are two appeals before us: Civil Appeal No 02(i)-64-09-2012 ("first appeal") and Civil Appeal No 02(i)-65-09-2012 ("second appeal"). Both appeals arose out of the High Court's decision on 30 June 2010, which was upheld unanimously by the Court of Appeal on 13 March 2012.

[2] The first appeal is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of Court of Appeal in affirming the High Court's decision in dismissing the appellant's application to set aside or alternatively discontinue the ad interim injunction granted on the 3 May 2005 in relation to a performance guarantee. The second appeal is the appellant's appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal in affirming the decision of the High Court in dismissing the appellant's application to set aside the concurrent writ of summons, notice of concurrent writ to be served outside jurisdiction, and the order granting leave to serve the notice of the concurrent writ, or alternatively for an order staying fur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top