SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 511

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
AMFRASER SECURITIES PTE LTD – Appellant
Versus
POH GAIK LYE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Foo Joon Liang,Tan Min ,Respondent Advocate: Yeoh Cho Kheong,Ho Kok Yew

Table of Content
1. overview of the bankruptcy notice issuance and background. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. judicial reasoning on the requirement of prior leave to execute judgment. (Para 9 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. court observations on the consequences of the notice being issued without necessary legal prerequisites. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
Ahmad Maarop FCJ:

[1] This judgment is prepared pursuant to s 78(1) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 , as our learned brother, Justice Apandi Ali FCJ has since resigned, upon his appointment as the Attorney General of Malaysia.

[2] In this appeal, the appellant is the judgment creditor and the respondent is the judgment debtor. This judgment concerns the appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Court of Appeal which overturned the decision of the High Court made on 15 June 2011. In its decision, the High Court reversed the decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar who had set aside the bankruptcy notice upon the application made by the respondent.

[3] The background facts leading to the present appeal are these. On 10 July 1998, the appellant obtained a summary judgment against the respondent in the sum of RM11,482,024.19 with interest at 13% f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top