SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 MarsdenLR 1171

COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
LOW CHENG SOON – Appellant
Versus
TA SECURITIES SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Joseph Clemons,Burhanudin Abdul Wahid,Alice Lee Sok Wah ,Respondent Advocate: YL Chong

JUDGMENT

Alauddin Mohd Sheriff JCA:

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the High Court Kuala Lumpur, which had allowed the respondent's claim and dismissed the appellant's counterclaim with costs.

[2] The respondent is a stockbroking firm and has been in this business since 1973. Previously the respondent was known as Othman & Ng Securities Sdn Bhd.

[3] The appellant is a client of the respondent. The appellant opened a trading account with the respondent sometime in 1990. The appellant's application to open the said trading account with the respondent was approved and given account no 16648.

[4] On 6 March 1990, the appellant signed a margin agreement with the respondent which has the effect of converting the appellant's retail account no 16648 into a margin account bearing the same number.

[5] The appellant traded in his account from 12 February 1990 to 6 March 1990 under his trading account no 16648 and thereafter under his margin account. A licensed dealer's representative (PW6) was assigned to handle the appellant's account and she was assisted by PW5, an administrative assistant.

[6] On 27 August 1990 the appellant signed another margin agreement with the respondent. This

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top