SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1184

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
CIMB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MAYBANK TRUSTEES BERHAD & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction of multiple civil appeals. (Para 1 , 1 , 2)
2. background facts regarding the bonds issuance. (Para 3 , 11)
3. facts related to the financing of pesaka through bonds. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 15 , 20)
4. arguments surrounding the need for compliance with conditions precedent. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 61 , 90)
5. court observations on bondholder rights. (Para 19 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. court of appeal observations regarding claims. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
7. court's conclusion on compliance with account conditions. (Para 65 , 66 , 86)
8. conclusion regarding liability and indemnity. (Para 80 , 89 , 92)
9. court conclusion on liability for full bond amount. (Para 91)
10. pre-judgment interest and its application. (Para 99 , 101)
11. mtb's claim for indemnity against pesaka. (Para 103 , 121)
12. final orders and conclusions of the court. (Para 158)

[1] There are five appeals before this court and they are:

(i) Civil Appeal No: 02(f)-27-04-2012(W) with CIMB Bank Berhad as the appellant and Maybank Trustees Berhad as the respondent;

(ii) Civil Appeal No: 02(f)-28-04-2012(W) with Datin Murnina bt Dato Haji Sujak as the appellant and Maybank Trustees Berhad as the resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top