SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 2599

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
IJM CORPORATION BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
ZAMRI HAJI IBRAHIM & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction of appeal (Para 1 , 1)
2. background of the sale and purchase agreement (Para 2)

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the High Court at Pulau Pinang, which came before us on 14 May 2013. The learned High Court Judge dismissed the claim of the plaintiff/appellant and allowed the counter-claim by the defendants/respondents. We have allowed the appeal of the appellant and we now give our reasons for our decision.

Brief Facts

[2] The appellant was the developer of a development project known as Wisma Pantai at Jalan Wisma Pantai, Kampung Gajah, 12200 Butterworth. The respondents are advocates and solicitors. By a sale and purchase agreement dated 6 May 1996, ("the agreement") they bought an almost completed office unit known as Unit 8-5 in a building ("the unit") in the said project for a purchase price of RM324,700.00. The respondents paid a deposit equivalent to ten per centum of the purchase price in the sum of RM32,470.00.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top