SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 1564

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DATO SRI ZULKIFLI OMAR & ORS – Appellant
Versus
AHMAD SKHRI RAMLI & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's negligence led to wrongful imprisonment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. various legal points raised in the appeal. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. obligation to obey court orders illustrates lawful authority. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. exemplary damages only in extreme cases of authority breaches. (Para 17 , 19)
5. the appeal is allowed, overturning lower court's ruling. (Para 18 , 20)
Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JCA:

[1] The appellants'/defendants' appeal in respect of damages awarded for wrongful imprisonment of the respondent/plaintiff came up for hearing on 8 May 2014 and upon hearing we allowed the appeal. My learned brother Azahar Mohamed JCA and my learned sister Aziah Ali JCA have read the draft judgment and approved the same. This is our judgment.

[2] It must be noted that the cross-appeal was withdrawn with the consent of the parties on the date of hearing.

Preliminaries

[3] A common sense approach needs to be applied to understand the case in the right perspective. Evidence will show the plaintiff/respondent was himself negligent and did not show receipt of payment of fie for which he was imprisoned notwithstanding that he was represented by solicitors as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top