COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PRESS METAL SARAWAK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ETIQA TAKAFUL BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties disagree on arbitration clause validity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court emphasizes arbitration clause enforceability. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. fraud allegations do not preclude arbitration. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. modern view favors arbitration over court intervention. (Para 8 , 9) |
[1] This appeal was heard on the 30th day of October 2014. The appeal arose from an application made by the respondent (defendant) (encl 4) pursuant to s 10 of the Arbitration Act 2005 (the said Act) and/or pursuant to the inherent jurisdiction of the court to stay proceedings in the High court pending the matter being referred to Arbitration (at pp 115-116 of the Appeal Record vol 1). The appellant (plaintiff) opposed the application. The High court granted the said order sought (at p 35 of the Appeal Record vol 1). The plaintiff appealed to this court on 18 June 2014 (at pp 37-38 of the Appeal Record vol 1).
[2] Facts germane to this appeal:
(a) The plaintiff operates an aluminium smelting plant ("plant") in Mukah, Sarawak;
(b) By a placement slip numbered D12EE0852324 dated 24 October 2012 ("placement slip") (at pp 286-295 of the Appeal Record vol 2(1)), the defendant, as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.