SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 2116

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PRESS METAL SARAWAK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ETIQA TAKAFUL BERHAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. parties disagree on arbitration clause validity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court emphasizes arbitration clause enforceability. (Para 4 , 5)
3. fraud allegations do not preclude arbitration. (Para 6 , 7)
4. modern view favors arbitration over court intervention. (Para 8 , 9)
Prasad Sandosham Abraham JCA:

[1] This appeal was heard on the 30th day of October 2014. The appeal arose from an application made by the respondent (defendant) (encl 4) pursuant to s 10 of the Arbitration Act 2005 (the said Act) and/or pursuant to the inherent jurisdiction of the court to stay proceedings in the High court pending the matter being referred to Arbitration (at pp 115-116 of the Appeal Record vol 1). The appellant (plaintiff) opposed the application. The High court granted the said order sought (at p 35 of the Appeal Record vol 1). The plaintiff appealed to this court on 18 June 2014 (at pp 37-38 of the Appeal Record vol 1).

[2] Facts germane to this appeal:

(a) The plaintiff operates an aluminium smelting plant ("plant") in Mukah, Sarawak;

(b) By a placement slip numbered D12EE0852324 dated 24 October 2012 ("placement slip") (at pp 286-295 of the Appeal Record vol 2(1)), the defendant, as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top