SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 MarsdenLR 2090

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BESHARAPAN SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
AGROCO PLANTATION SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Hamid Ismail ,Respondent Advocate: Liew Ting Ting

JUDGMENT

Arifin Zakaria JCA:

[1] The subject matter of the dispute in this case is a piece of land measuring 997 acres bearing title deed CL 085311075, situated at Sungai Ruku-Ruku, Labuk/Sugut, Sabah (the subject land). The learned Judge had meticulously set out the relevant facts in his Judgment which for convenience are reproduced below:

One set of chronology of events which are not in dispute are as follows:

(a) On 1 February 1989 the 2nd and 3rd Defendants entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement with the 2nd Plaintiff in respect of the subject land with a consideration of RM100,000.00;

(b) On 1 February 1989 the 2nd and 3rd Defendants also executed a Power of Attorney thereby appointing the 2nd Plaintiff as their attorney;

(c) A supplementary Agreement was also entered into between the 2nd and 3rd Defendants and the 2nd Plaintiff on 6 March 1989;

(d) Pursuant to his appointment as the attorney for the 2nd and 3rd Defendants, the 2nd Plaintiff signed the draft title of the subject land on 14 August 1989;

(e) On 15 January 1993 the 2nd Plaintiff sold the subject land to the 1st Plaintiffs Vide a Sale and Purchase Agreement on even date at the price of RM185,630.00;

(f) And on the same

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top