COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AHMAD MUKAMAL ABDUL WAHAB & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants charged with drug trafficking. (Para 1) |
| 2. appellants' involvement in drug trafficking (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. assessment of evidence for the 2nd appellant (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal standards for evaluating defense and prosecution evidence (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
[1] We heard all the 3 appeals of the appellants/accused on 11 January 2013, and on the same day, dismissed the 1st and 3rd appellant's appeal and allowed the 2nd appellant's appeal. My learned brothers, Mohamed Apandi bin Haji Ali JCA and Linton Albert JCA, have read the judgment in draft form and approved the same. This is our judgment in respect of appeal No: C-05-44-2011. It must be noted that there is only one appeal number for all the 3 appeals.
Brief Facts
[2] The appellants were charged for trafficking dangerous drugs under s 39B(1) (a) DDA 1952 , to be read with s 34. The said charge reads as follows:
"Bahawa kamu, bersama-sama pada 9 Mac 2010, lebih kurang jam 12:30 tengah malam, di kawasan tempat letak kereta R&R Genting Sempah, dalam daerah Bentong, di dalam Negeri Pahang, telah didapati mengedar dadah berbahaya jenis cannabis seberat 4,521 gram, dan dengan itu, kamu telah melakukan suatu ke
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.