SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 MarsdenLR 217

GILL, ONG HOCK SIM, RAJA AZLAN SHAH
HASHIM BIN SAUD – Appellant
Versus
YAHAYA BIN HASHIM – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - Karpal Singh; Karpal Singh, Wong & Co. For the respondents - Fong Seng Yee (Senior Federal Counsel)

JUDGMENT

Raja Azlan Shah FJ:

In this appel which we dismissed the central issue was the time-honoured question of the constitutional right of an arrested person to counsel. When does such right begin?

The learned trial judge had this to say:

It will be seen that the law regarding the constitutional right to consult counsel must be reconciled with actual practice with regard to police investigations under the Criminal Procedure Code.seems to me that as the purpose of detention under s. 117 CPC is for the purpose of completing investigations and as the constitutional right to consult counsel 'should not be exercised to the detriment of investigation', then for so long as an arrested person is detained under s. 117 CPC he cannot exercise his right to consult counsel. I therefore hold that the right to consult counsel begins from the moment of arrest but the exercise of that right is postponed for so long as the arrested person is detained under s. 117 CPC.

In this case the request to consult counsel was made during the period the plaintiff was under detention under s. 117 CPC. The plaintiff, therefore, could not exercise his right at the material time and consequently there could n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top