SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 2224

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
HERLINA PURNAMA SARI – Respondent


Idrus Harun JCA:

The Charge

[1] The person charged in this case is a 35 year old woman namely Herlina Purnama Sari, an Indonesian national (the respondent). She was charged in the following terms:

"Bahawa kamu pada 30 November 2012, lebih kurang jam 5.20 pagi di Kaunter Pendaftaran Masuk Penerbangan Antarabangsa No. R22, Terminal Pengangkutan Tambang Murah (LCCT), di dalam Daerah Sepang, dalam negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan, telah didapati mengedar dadah berbahaya iaitu heroin seberat 303.4 gram dan monoacetylmorphines seberat 105.5 gram dan dengan itu kamu telah melakukan kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama."

Case For The Prosecution

[2] At the commencement of the prosecution's case, in her opening statement (Exhibit P4), the learned Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) informed the court that the prosecution would seek to prove the offence with which the respondent was charged by direct as well as circumstantial evidence and to the extent that the situation permitted, the prosecution would also rely on the presumption in s 37(d) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (Act 234).

[3] On 29 December 2012 at about 10.30 pm, acting

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top