HUANG YANHONG vs PP - 2017 MarsdenLR 2233

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 MarsdenLR 2233

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
HUANG YANHONG – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent

Table of Content
1. charge against the appellant. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of how drugs were found. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10)
3. seizure and analysis of the drugs. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. appellant's defense and claims. (Para 17 , 19 , 20)
5. appellant's defense and claims of innocence. (Para 18)
6. court's examination of knowledge and presumption. (Para 22 , 23 , 32)
7. court's observations on appellant's defense. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 33)

The Charge

[1] The appellant (the 1st accused in the High Court) was originally charged and jointly tried with another accused (Hyde Anatune - in case number 45A-165-2010) in the High Court of Shah Alam for the following charge:

'Bahawa kamu, bersama-sama pada 21 Mac 2010, jam lebih kurang 7.00 pagi, di kawasan Pintu 4, Aras 5, MTB KLIA, di dalam Daerah Sepang, di dalam Negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan, untuk mencapai niat bersama sebagaimana ditakrifkan di bawah s 34 Kanun Keseksaan telah memperedarkan dadah berbahaya sejumlah berat 581.8 gram (iaitu Heroin sejumlah 520 gram dan Monoacetylmorphines sejumlah berat 61.8 gram), oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1) Akta Dadah Berbahaya dan boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 MarsdenLR 2233

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAHUANG YANHONG – AppellantVersusPP – Respondent

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
HUANG YANHONG – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent