SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 MarsdenLR 1525

JEFFREY TAN
BMC CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
DATARAN RENTAS SDN BHD – Respondent


Advocates:
For the petitioner - Karin Lim; M/s Lim Leng Han & Co For the respondent - Ong Kah Lee; M/s Tharumal & Co

JUDGMENT

Jeffrey Tan J:

This is the petitioner's petition dated 16 September 1998, for an order winding up the respondent company, on the ground that the respondent is unable to pay its debts. The background facts and arguments appear as follows.

According to the petitioner, the respondent is indebted to the petitioner in the sum of RM173,096.18, it being the sum due and owing to petitioner in respect of four unpaid progress payment certificates (payment certificates Nos 5-8) for building works executed by the petitioner and it also being the sum demanded from the respondent by the petitioner's s. 218(2)(a) of the Companies Act 1965(Act) notice dated 29 July 1998, the respondent has for three weeks thereafter receipt of the said notice neglected to pay the said sum, and, the respondent is unable to pay its debts.

In its affidavits opposing the petition, the respondent denied that the sum of RM173,096.18 is due and owing to the petitioner. The respondent exhibited, (i) the respondent's reply dated 31 July 1998 (encl. 11 exh. "T-1") to the petitioner's statutory notice, and, (ii) the respondent's writ of summons dated 29 October 1998 (encl. 11 exh. "T-2") claiming from the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top