SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 542

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SERUAN GEMILANG MAKMUR SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PEGAWAI KEWANGAN NEGERI PAHANG – Respondent


Table of Content
1. the judicial review process and its procedural timelines are crucial in determining rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments for application extensions hinge on the justiciability and prior judgments. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
3. the final conclusion supports the appellant's opportunity for judicial review relief. (Para 43)
Mohd Zawawi Salleh JCA:

Introduction

[1] This appeal is directed against the decision of the High Court in Kuantan (Mariana Yahya J presiding) dated 3 October 2013 dismissing the appellant's application for an extension of time to apply for leave to commence judicial review proceedings.

[2] This appeal is concerned with whether time should be extended to apply for leave for judicial review. However, strictly speaking, this is a side show. The main show is the application for leave to apply for an order of mandamus against the respondent, directing the respondent to make payment of the judgment sum in favour of the applicant as stipulated in the certificate issued pursuant to s 33 of the Government Proceedings Act 1956 dated 7 March 2008 in the original suit. On 7 April 2008, the certificate was served on the State Legal Advisor acting on behalf of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top