SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 197

SESSIONS COURT KUALA LUMPUR
PP – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMAD ZAKI OMAR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Nurilya Ellyna Nor Azmal ,Respondent Advocate: Asiah Abd Jalil

JUDGMENT

Edwin Paramjothy Michael Muniandy J:

[1] Muhammad Zaki bin Omar (accused) was charged under s 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 ("the CMA") for using the Facebook application to knowingly making and initiating the transmission as exhibited in Lampiran A (impugned post) which is offensive in character with intent to annoy.

[2] The charge preferred against the accused reads as follows:

PERTUDUHAN

"Bahawa kamu pada 4 April 2021 jam lebih kurang 8.44 petang, melalui perkhidmatan aplikasi Facebook dengan menggunakan laman profil Facebook "Muhammad Zaki Omar" di pautan https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=102226 21108809262&id=1018604586 secara sedar membuat dan memulakan penghantaran komunikasi yang jelik sifatnya sepertimana di LAMPIRAN A dengan niat untuk menyakitkan hati orang lain, yang telah dibaca pada 5 April 2021 jam lebih kurang 11:30 pagi di Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia, Putrajaya. Oleh itu kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 233(1)(a) Akta Komunikasi dan Multimedia 1998 [Akta 588] dan boleh dihukum di bawah s 233(3) Akta yang sama.

[3] Lampiran A to the charge sheet is produced hereunder:

Lampiran A

Facebook post by "Muhammad Zak


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top