SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 MarsdenLR 280

.
LEE HOCK NING – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - N.T. Rajah; Maxwell, Kenion, Cowdy & Jones For the respondent - Abdul Razak bin Dato Abu Samah (SFC)

JUDGMENT

Ong (Malaya) CJ:

The facts so far as they are material to this report, appear sufficiently from the judgment of the Chief Justice.

The appellant was a building contractor. On 27 May 1963 he entered into a written contractNo. 214/63 with the Malaysian Government to construct certain works and buildings for the sum of $23,680. A second contract in writing,No. 227/63, was made on 7 August 1963 between the parties for other works and buildings costing $11,315. The works and buildings under both contracts were duly completed to the satisfaction of the Government. In respect of the first contract,No. 214/63, the Government had withheld as "retention moneys" the sum of $1,184, as it was entitled to do during the "defects liability period" - which in the instant case, was six months from date of completion. The completion date was 3 February 1964; hence this sum was lawfully retained until 3 August 1964.

For the second contract,No. 227/63. the appellant had paid the Government a sum of $565.75 as "security deposit" upon acceptance of his tender. This contract was completed by the appellant on 5 February 1964 and, even assuming that a portion of the contract price of $11,315 coul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top