.
LEE HOCK NING – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA – Respondent
Ong (Malaya) CJ:
The facts so far as they are material to this report, appear sufficiently from the judgment of the Chief Justice.
The appellant was a building contractor. On 27 May 1963 he entered into a written contractNo. 214/63 with the Malaysian Government to construct certain works and buildings for the sum of $23,680. A second contract in writing,No. 227/63, was made on 7 August 1963 between the parties for other works and buildings costing $11,315. The works and buildings under both contracts were duly completed to the satisfaction of the Government. In respect of the first contract,No. 214/63, the Government had withheld as "retention moneys" the sum of $1,184, as it was entitled to do during the "defects liability period" - which in the instant case, was six months from date of completion. The completion date was 3 February 1964; hence this sum was lawfully retained until 3 August 1964.
For the second contract,No. 227/63. the appellant had paid the Government a sum of $565.75 as "security deposit" upon acceptance of his tender. This contract was completed by the appellant on 5 February 1964 and, even assuming that a portion of the contract price of $11,315 coul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.