Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
TAY HWEE LAN – Appellant
Versus
HEALTHY VISION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claimant dismissed without reason (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 2. respondent failed to file (Para 4) |
| 3. claimant's contention (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. court finds dismissal unjustified (Para 56 , 57) |
| 5. total compensation awarded (Para 66) |
AWARD
Reference
[1] This is a reference pursuant to s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("The Act") arising out of the alleged dismissal of Tay Hwee Lan ("Claimant") by Healthy Vision ("Company") on the 1 January 2021.
[2] The reference in this case by the Director General of Industrial Relation's requires the Court to adjudicate the Claimant's complaint of dismissal by the Company on 1 January 2021.
Procedural Background
[3] The matter was initially before the Industrial Court in Johor Bahru. However, by way of Interim Award No 1610 of 2023 [[2023] MELRU 1610], it was transferred to the Industrial Court in Kuala Lumpur.
[4] On 18 September 2023, this Court issued directions for the Respondent to file their Statement In Reply. Despite the Court 's instructions and the granting of multipl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
