SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 MarsdenLR 176

HIGH COURT MALAYA ALOR SETAR
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
LIM TEE YONG & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Lor Chin Yoon ,Respondent Advocate: Tan Lip Gay

JUDGMENT

Mohd Hishamudin Mohd Yunus JC:

[1] This is an application by the plaintiff for summary judgment against the second, third and fourth defendants pursuant to O 14 of the Rules of the High (default judgment had already been obtained against the first defendant).

[2] All the defendants are partners of a partnership known as "Eng Hup Seng Ricemill and Trading Company."

[3] The plaintiff, in its statement of claim, avers that it had granted the partnership with an overdraft facility and that as of 31 October 1992, the partnership, in breach of the condition of the facility, had exceeded the limit of RM800,000 by RM356,598.78. Despite being reminded by the plaintiff to regularise the account, the defendants had failed to do so. Accordingly, the plaintiff served each of the defendants with a letter of demand demanding that the amount of RM1,156,598.78 be paid within fourteen days. The defendants failed to comply. By this action, the plaintiff claims for the said amount.

[4] In support of its application, the plaintiff filed four affidavits, that is to say:

(a) the affidavit of Abdul Hamid bin Ku Saad affirmed on 23 August 1993 (encl 14);

(b) the affidavit ("afidavit pembetulan") of Abdu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top