WEE HUAY FONG vs PENTADBIR TANAH KLANG - 2002 MarsdenLR 1843 ; 2002 MarsdenLR 1

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2002 MarsdenLR 1843 ; 2002 MarsdenLR 1

ZULKEFLI MAKINUDIN
WEE HUAY FONG – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH KLANG – Respondent

Advocates:
For the applicant - Amrit Kaur; M/s Lee Swee Seng
For the 1st respondent - Mohd Asnawi Abu Hanipah, Assistant State Legal Adviser Selangor
For the 2nd respondent - JL Foo; M/s Lee Hishammuddin

WEE HUAY FONG vs PENTADBIR TANAH KLANG - 2002 MarsdenLR 1843 ; 2002 MarsdenLR 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2002 MarsdenLR 1843 ; 2002 MarsdenLR 1

ZULKEFLI MAKINUDINWEE HUAY FONG – AppellantVersusPENTADBIR TANAH KLANG – Respondent

ZULKEFLI MAKINUDIN
WEE HUAY FONG – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH KLANG – Respondent