LOW HOP BING KMN
PRESIDENT HOTEL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
DATUK BANDAR & ANOR AND CREST TRADING SDN BHD (INTERVENER) – Respondent
Low Hop Bing KMN JC:
Application
The intervener vide Encl. 30 applies to set aside the leave and extension of time granted ex parte to the applicant on 8 September 1993, pursuant to O.53 r.1(A) of the Rules of High Court 1980. At the time of intervention, the intervener vide Encl. 20 gave notice to the Court and obtained an order enabling it to "make any application as may be necessary" in the proceedings.
The applicant vide its main application in Encl. 21 purports to challenge a development order dated 22 October 1991 (Development Order) issued by the Datuk Bandar (respondent 1) in favour of the intervener to construct a 17 storey hotel called Fairmont Hotel on Lots 812-816, Section 67, Jalan Walter Grenier, Kuala Lumpur which are adjacent to Lot 817 belonging to the applicant. The development order was issued without according a right of hearing to the adjacent landowner e.g. applicant in accordance with the then prevalent practice at Dewan Bandaraya on planning matters.
About 10 months later, on 7 August 1992, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Datin Azizah v. Datuk Bandar [1992] 2 MLJ 393 pronouncing for the first time that the Emergency Planning (Developmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.