INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
AMPAC MARKETING SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
JULIUS J ANTHONYSAMY – Respondent
AWARD
The dispute is over the dismissal of the claimant by the company.
The claimant contends he had been dismissed without just cause and excuse.
At the outset of the hearing on 28 September 2001 the claimant and his counsel were presented. However the company was not represented by counsel. The company's marketing executive who was present asked the court to postpone the hearing but this was disallowed. The claimant's counsel then applied to proceed ex parte under s. 29(d) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") which application was allowed by the court.
The claimant gave evidence that he commenced employment with the company on 15 May 1996 as the marketing and sales manager. His basic salary was RM5,000 per month and he was also paid RM400 and RM300 monthly for transport and handphone allowances respectively. Subsequently in September 1996 he was confirmed. The claimant travelled locally and internationally to promote the company's products. In July 1997, the claimant submitted his claims for all the expenses incurred on the various business trips done for the company to Solomon Jacobson, the director of sales and marketing. The claim amounted to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.