SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 MarsdenLR 253

AZMI, ONG HOCK SIM, SUFFIAN
NG SIEW SAN – Appellant
Versus
MENAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - M. Segaram; M/s. Segaram & Co. For the respondent - V.K. Palasuntharam; V.K. Palasuntharam

JUDGMENT

Azmi LP:

Menaka wife of M Deivarayan (hereinafter referred to as Menaka) applied by way of originating summons to the High Court at Kuala Lumpur for an order of sale by public auction of certain pieces of land (hereinafter referred to as the said lands) to satisfy a principal sum of $20,000 and interest thereon, lent by her to Ng Siew San (hereinafter referred to as Ng). The said lands were charged to Menaka and a charge was registered at the Land Office as security for the said loan. The application was made by one Nachiappa Chettiar acting as the attorney of Menaka. In my view it is important to note that nowhere in his affidavit in support of the application for the sale of the land did Nachiappa state that the moneylender was the AR PR M Firm and that Menaka was merely the managing director.

Ng objected to the application upon several grounds and set out the facts and his grounds of objections which I summarise as follows:

(1)Menaka was licensed to carry on the business of moneylending under the authorised name of AR PR M Firm at the authorised address of 30 Leboh Ampang, Kuala Lumpur.

(2)Manickam Chettiar was licensed to carry on the business of moneylending as age

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top