FEDERAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
LING WAH PRESS (M) SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
TAN SRI DATO VINCENT TAN CHEE YIOUN & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the procedural initializations of the hearing and counsel's objections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. summary of damages awarded by the initial courts. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. principles for appellate interference in damages assessment. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. arguments regarding comparability of damages between defamation and personal injury. (Para 12 , 15) |
| 5. discussion on the boundaries of freedom of speech versus defamation. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 6. conclusions on the rationality of awarded damages and dismissal of appeals. (Para 27 , 31) |
[1] These three appeals were with consent of parties, set down for hearing together At the outset counsel for appellant Ling Wah Press Sdn Bhd informed the court that he had received no instruction to proceed, and as no one from Ling Wah Press was present in court, the appeal was struck out with costs.
[2] Encik Karpal Singh for 1st appellant (Encik M G G Pillai) drew the attention of the court to a newspaper cutting where the Chief Justice when interviewed by the press two years earlier on 24 October 1996 had expressed his views that in libel cases persons of higher status would receive higher damages than those of lower status. He as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.