SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 MarsdenLR 1605

KL REKHRA
MASKIMI SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LEE POH HENG – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - HM Ooi; M/s Logan Sabapathy & Co For the defendant - Yusman Badar; M/s Amir Faezal Norzela & Chong

JUDGMENT

KL Rekhraj J:

Pursuant to the sale and purchase agreement dated 7 August 1995; and entered into between the plaintiffs; as the purchasers on the one part; and the defendant as the vendor on the other part (hereinafter called the sale and purchase agreement) wherein the vendor as the owner and as beneficial owner agreed to sell 1,530,000 shares held by him in Hamsay Glass Sdn. Bhd. (company) at a purchase consideration of RM6,340,000 (purchase price) upon terms and conditions as provided therein - inter alia, under cl. 8.2.3 upon a warranty representation of the defendant (vendor), that the company shall have a minimum profits for a period of three years effective 30 June 1997 as follows:

(a) for the year ending 1997 RM2 million;

(b) for the year ending 1998 RM2 million; and

(c) for the year ending 1999 RM2 million.

Further by cl. 8.3 of the agreement, the defendant undertook to indemnify and keep indemnified the purchasers against all losses arising out of all or any breach of warranties, undertakings or covenants and or misrepresentations. In addition to the above, the defendant also by cl. 8.9 of the said agreement warranted "the vendor further warrants and undertake

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top