SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 MarsdenLR 188

YUSOF ABDUL RASHID
TEH HWA SEONG – Appellant
Versus
CHOP LIM CHIN MOH – Respondent


Advocates:
Upali Masacorale for the plaintiff.
Ng Kong Yeam for the defendants.
Solicitors: Jackson & Masacorale; Kong Yeam & Hassan.

Yusof Abdul Rashid J

The plaintiff's claim is for damages and loss in respect of personal injuries sustained in a motor accident occurring due to the alleged negligence of the second defendant who was the servant of the first defendant. It was common ground that on January 11, 1975 about 3.35 p.m. the plaintiff was a passenger in a motor lorry No. NC 6527 owned by the first defendants and driven by the second defendant, the servant of the first defendants. At 3¾ milestone Jalan Cha'ah-Bekok, Johor, the lorry overturned.

The first defendants contended that the plaintiff had been warned by the second defendant that he travelled in the motor lorry at his own risk and that the plaintiff's attention was directed to a label "Riding. At Your Own Risk" affixed near the passenger's seat by the side of the driver's seat. It seems to me that the defence raised by the defendants was a defence of "volenti non fit injuria". It was noted that the first defendants did not raise a defence that the second defendant had allowed the plaintiff to travel in the motor lorry in breach of the prohibition to do so by the first defendants.

In evidence I found the plaintiff had successfully proved that on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top