SOBEHAH CHE WAN vs BANK PERTANIAN MALAYSIA BERHAD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1470

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SOBEHAH CHE WAN – Appellant
Versus
BANK PERTANIAN MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Balbir Singh,Daniel Ong ,Respondent Advocate: Jeyanthini Kannaperan,Pauline

Table of Content
1. unanimous decision on appeal dismissal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. factual background of loan and property. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. appellant's claims of bad faith and under-valuation. (Para 20 , 21 , 30 , 31)
4. legal standards for property valuation. (Para 25 , 27 , 37 , 42 , 46)
5. validity of order for sale based on valuation. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 41)
6. court's conclusion on appellant's arguments. (Para 49 , 50 , 54 , 56 , 58)

Yaacob Md Sam JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is our unanimous decision for this appeal against the learned High Court Judge's decision in dismissing the Amended Originating Summons to, inter alia, set aside an Order for sale and/or in the alternative, an order for damages to be made in favour of the Appellant against the Respondent.

[2] After considering Counsels' full submission at great length, both oral and written, we dismissed the appeal.

[3] We provide our reasons herein below.

Agreed Background Facts

[4] The common agreed background facts submitted by parties in their submissions and the ground of judgment by the learned High Court Judge are condensed and set out below.

[5] The Appellant had pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1470

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYASOBEHAH CHE WAN – AppellantVersusBANK PERTANIAN MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SOBEHAH CHE WAN – Appellant
Versus
BANK PERTANIAN MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent