CHARLES HO
MOHAMED ALIAS – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent
The appellant in this case was convicted by the Magistrate Court of the First Class at Labuan on a charge under section 4(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1961, and was sentenced to 4 months' imprisonment and ordered to pay a sum of $60/- under section 13 of the said Act. He appealed against sentence and conviction.
I heard the appeal on October 6, 1981 and allowed it. I ordered a retrial in this case. I said I would reduce the grounds of my decision in writing which I now do.
The petition of appeal contained seven grounds, most of which are overlapping. Counsel for the appellant decided, I think correctly, at the outset of the heating to pursue two of the grounds only. In view of the order for retrial which I have made I do not think I should go into the evidence or comment on it too far.
Very briefly the case for the prosecution was that the appellant as a police officer demanded and obtained a sum of $60/- from P.W.4 for forbearing to take any action against P.W.4 in respect of a traffic offence. The defence very shortly was that the sum of $60/- received by the appellant was repayment of a loan which appellant had made to P.W.4 as evidenced by a letter signe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.