FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
HONG LEONG FINANCE BHD – Appellant
Versus
LOW THIAM HOE & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
Introduction
[1] These are two appeals filed before us by the appellant against the two decisions of the Court of Appeal on 7 November 2012 which allowed the appeals by the respondent against the decisions of the High Court. The appellant was the plaintiff and the respondent was the defendant before the High Court. We shall refer to the parties as they were before the High Court.
[2] There were two separate appeals before the Court of Appeal. We shall refer to the first appeal as the amendment appeal and the second appeal as the merits appeal. The Court of Appeal had allowed the defendants appeal in the amendment appeal against the High Courts dismissal of the defendants application to amend the defence and counterclaim (the first decision). The Court of Appeal also made an order setting aside the High Courts judgment entered against the defendant after full trial in the merits appeal and ordered a new trial of the whole action before another judge (the second decision).
[3] It is to be noted that the defendant did not apply for a stay of the hearing on the merits of the plaintiffs case upon his application to amend the defence and the counterclaim being
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.