SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 MarsdenLR 1226

COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
GUAN TEIK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
HJ MOHD NOOR HJ YAKOB & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ghazi Ishak,Edward Andrew ,Respondent Advocate: JA Yeoh

Siti Norma Yaakob JCA:

[1] The dispute in this appeal is about the dealings and transactions conducted over a piece of land comprised in Grant for Land (Surat Putus) No 4437, Portion No 123 in the Mukim of Sungei Pasir, District of Kuala Muda in the State of Kedah containing an area of 138 relongs 458 jembar ("the land"). The registered proprietors of the land are the three respondents before us and one Haji Abdul Latiff bin Talib ("Latiff") in equal undivided shares. Latiff is not a party in these proceedings.

[2] The land was purchased by the first respondent at a public auction on 15 December 1973, for RM80,000. Since he had successfully bidded at the auction, the land was initially registered in his name as sole proprietor on 6 February 1974, but on the same day the land was transferred and registered in his name and three others as well, they being the second and third respondents and Latiff in equal shares. It is the third respondent's evidence that he paid the first respondent, his brother-in-law RM20,000 for his 1/4 share 1 of the land. The second respondent is the first respondent's wife and Latiff is a good friend. Dealings in the land after this were conducted principally

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top