SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 3016

INDUSTRIAL COURT SARAWAK
IRWIN COLLIN ARAN – Appellant
Versus
SCHLUMBERGER WTA (M) SDN BHD – Respondent
Award No: 2358 Of 2018 [Case No: 8/4-566/15]



Petitioner Advocates:Jonathan Bedindang ,Respondent Advocate: Nicholas Wung Duk Ing

The dismissal of an employee for redundancy is valid if supported by evidence of a genuine lack of work.

Headnote:This case involves a Ministerial reference to the Industrial Court under the Industrial Relations Act 1967 concerning the dismissal of a Claimant on alleged redundancy grounds. The Claimant contended the termination lacked just cause, while the Company asserted a genuine redundancy situation existed. The Court's findings confirmed the Company’s actions were justified based on lack of operational activity. The primary issue addressed was whether the termination was genuine redundancy. The Court ruled that the dismissal was with just cause and excuse, upholding the Company’s position, resulting in the Claimant's case being dismissed.

Table of Content
1. claimant's employment details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. termination context and claims. (Para 8 , 9)

[1] This is a Ministerial reference to the Industrial Court under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ( IRA ) made on 26th June, 2015 for an award in respect of the dismissal of Irwin Collin Aran (Claimant) by Schlumberger WTA (M) Sdn Bhd (Company) on 13th November, 2014.

A. Background Facts

[2] The Company, by their Letter of Offer dated 10 October 2012, offered the Claimant a job called Shell Miri Directional Drilling (DD) Co-ordinator under the Sarawak Shell Bhd Contract No 600876, based in Miri with an Annual base salary of RM168,000.00 or equivalent to RM14,000.00 per month). The Claimant accepted the aforesaid offer with effect from 01 January 2013.

[3] In addition to the Letter of Offer, the other terms and conditions of the Claimant's employment are contained in the Company's Home Country Resident Manual (HC Manual) at pp 5 - 55 of COBD. As Shell Miri DD Coordinator, the Claimant was based in Miri at all material times.

[4] The Claimant was responsible to provide drilling support services to Sarawak Shell Bhd in respect of Shell Shallow Water operations, at Shell office in Lutong, Miri.

[5] When the Claimant joined the Company he was offered a Sign On Bonus of USD30,000.00.

[6] In addiLion Lo Annual Base Salary and Sign on Bonus, the Claimant also received Guaranteed Job Bonus (GJB) of 25 days per month, which worked out to an average of RM40,477.74.

[7] The Claimant was taken in by the Company as regular staff and joined the Company with effect from 01 January 2013.

[8] On 13 November 2014, the Company terminated the services of the Claimant on the ground that the Claimant's role as DD Co-ordinator in Miri does not exist.

[9] The Claimant is alleging that his termination by the Company is without just cause and excuse. By this action the Claimant prays to be reinstated to his former position in the Company and for other reliefs as stated in the Statement of Case.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top