COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
KOSBINA KONSULT (K) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MADU JAYA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant's retention of arbitral award benefits must align with contractual terms. (Para 1) |
| 2. the nature of the relationship between the appellant and respondent was primarily contractual. (Para 12 , 13) |
[1] This was an appeal by Kosbina Konsult (K) Sdn Bhd ("the appellant") against the decision of the High Court in allowing Madu Jaya Development Sdn Bhd's ("the respondent") claim for inter alia certain monies that the appellant obtained from the Government of Malaysia ("the Government").
[2] We had unanimously allowed the appeal. These are our full reasons.
The Background Facts
[3] On 12 June 2003, the appellant was awarded a contract by the Government for a project known as 'Naik Taraf Laluan Persekutuan 136 Dari Persimpangan Jalan Masuk ke Lebuhraya Utara/Selatan Hingga Bandar Baru (Km 42-Km 50)' ("the main contract").
[4] By way of a subcontract dated 5 May 2004 entered into between the appellant and Danaukhas Holdings Sdn Bhd ("Danaukhas") (now in liquidation), the entire works of the main contract was awarded to Danaukhas. The terms of the subcontract between the appellant and Danuakhas, inter alia was that the appellant was entitled to 10% commission of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.