GANASON ARUMUGAM vs MALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 829

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
GANASON ARUMUGAM – Appellant
Versus
MALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:P Jayasingam,Reyna Lim Khong Yen ,Respondent Advocate: Rutheran Sivagnanam,Teh Wen Min

Table of Content
1. the reference stems from the complaint regarding dismissal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. claimant's employment details and issues leading to dismissal. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. allegations of misconduct and procedural adherence. (Para 19 , 25 , 88 , 89)
4. court's observation on the validity of circumstances for dismissal. (Para 82 , 141)
5. final ruling upheld the dismissal based on misconduct. (Para 147)

Paramalingam J Doraisamy:

Reference

[1] This is a reference made under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Act 177), arising out of the dismissal of Ganason a/l Arumugam (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") by Malaysian Resources Corporation Berhad (hereinafter referred to as "the 1st Company") and MRCB Builders Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as "the 2nd Company") on 21 November 2019.

[2] The Ministerial reference in this case required the Court to hear and determine the Claimant's complaint of dismissal by the Company on 21 November 2019.

I. Procedural History

[3] The Court received the letters pertaining to the Ministerial reference under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 on 17 July 2020.

[4] The matters were fixed for men

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 829

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPURGANASON ARUMUGAM – AppellantVersusMALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
GANASON ARUMUGAM – Appellant
Versus
MALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD – Respondent