SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 MarsdenLR 27

HIGH COURT MALAYA ALOR SETAR
CHE DIN AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Triptipal Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Shaik Daud Haji Mohamed Ismail

JUDGMENT

Syed Agil Barakbah J:

[1] This is an application under s 317 of the Criminal Procedure Code for additional evidence to be adduced at the hearing of the appeal. The evidence intended to be adduced is from one Mohd Yusof bin Ladin to the effect that Abdul Jalil bin Nordin (PW8) had committed perjury at the trial of the appellant before the President, Sessions Court, Kangar, on 3 April 1974. The charge against the appellant was for corruptly accepting a gratification under s 4(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1961. He was found guilty of the charge by the Learned President, convicted and sentenced to six months imprisonment. In addition a penalty of $130 under s 13 of the Act was imposed. Against this conviction and sentence he has now appealed. At the trial the appellant was represented by Counsel.

[2] The brief facts of the case were that two trawler boats belonging to the complainant Abu bin Suleiman (PW6) were detained by the appellant, a police corporal attached to the Marine Branch, Kuala Perlis, and the taikong and crew were charged for operating them without licence. While PW6 was setting in a coffee shop it was alleged that the appellant went and spoke to him and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top