SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 624

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
JACK-IN-PILE (M) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BAUER (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Respondent


Introduction And Background Facts

[1] By Letter of Award dated 16 March 2011, Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Bauer) appointed Jack-In-Pile (M) Sdn Bhd (JIP) as its sub-contractor for a project known as "Cadangan Membina 3 Blok 39 Tingkat 689 Unit Rumah Pangsa Kos Tinggi dan 23 Unit Kedai 2 Tingkat yang mengandungi Kemudahan Tadika, Dewan Serbaguna, Surau serta 4 Tingkat Podium Tempat Letak Kereta & Rekreasi dengan 1 Tingkat Basemen di atas Lot PT 3901, HS (D) 61423, Jalan Aman Fasa III (Kg Berembang), Mukim Ulu Klang, Daerah Gombak, Selangor Darul Ehsan - Subcontract for the Supply & Installation of Spun Piles (contract). The contract sum was RM1,850,000.00.

[2] Payment disputes arose in respect of progress claim no 8 which JIP contended was not certified and paid by Bauer. Adjudication proceedings pursuant to pursuant to Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA) were commenced by JIP. At the conclusion of adjudication proceedings, the adjudicator delivered his decision dated 23 November 2016 whereupon Bauer was to pay JIP the adjudicated amount of RM906,034.00, interest, cost of proceedings and JIP's legal fees, within 14 working days from the date of decision.

App

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top