SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 561

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DATUK S NALLAKARUPPAN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
DATUK SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeals overview (Para 1)
2. facts of defamation case (Para 2 , 4)
3. arguments on evidence act (Para 5 , 8 , 9)
4. legal observations on section 43 (Para 10 , 11 , 19)
Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim JCA:

The Appeals

[1] There are three appeals before us:

(i) Appeal No: W-02(IM)(NCVC)-153-01-2013 - 1st defendant/ appellant appealed against the High Court decision on 26 December 2012 allowing in part the plaintiff/respondent's application to strike out certain paragraphs in the 1st defendant defence - paras 1, 1.1 to 1.3, 9 (f), (g), (h), 10.1 to 10.7) and para 18.

(ii) Appeal No: W-02(IM)(NCVC)-249-01-2013 - 2nd defendant and 3rd defendant/1st appellant and 2nd appellant respectively appealed against the same High Court decision allowing plaintiff/respondent's application to strike out para 1.1 till 1.8 of the 2nd defendant and 3rd defendant's defence in respect of defence of justification.

(iii) Appeal No: W-02(IM)(NCVC)-261-01-2013 - plaintiff/ respondent appealed against the same High Court decision dismissing the plaintiff's application to strike out the respondent/1st defendant, 2nd defendant, 3rd defendant's defence in para 1.1 till 1.8 of the 2nd defendant and 3rd defendan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top