CHONG SIEW FAI SABAH, SARAWAK, EDGAR OSEPH R, SHAIK DAUD ISMAIL
GANAPATHY RENGASAMY – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent
Chong Siew Fai CJ (Sabah & Sarawak):
At the conclusion of the hearing before us, and after a short deliberation, Edgar Joseph Jr FCJ and Shaik Daud, JCA allowed the appeal, quashed the conviction and set aside the sentence of death. I differed from them with regret. We indicated that reasons for our different conclusions would be given. I now give mine.
I do not propose to repeat the history and the facts of this case, which have already been clearly rehearsed in the judgment of Shaik Daud, JCA.
For convenience, I shall call the appellant "the accused".
Grounds Of Appeal
Altogether there were eight grounds of appeal as follows:
(A) The learned trial judge erred in:
(a) convicting the accused under s. 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (the Act);
(b) convicting the accused since there was no clear, direct evidence showing that he had knowledge, custody and control of the drugs;
(c) failing to consider that the existence of a 3rd party, one Abdul Rahman bin Noh alias Ah Kiong, who was also arrested on a charge of drug trafficking, had created a doubt in this case;
(d) failing to consider Mohamad Radhi bin Yaakob v. Pendakwa Raya [1991] 3 MLJ 169 SC;
(e) failing to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.