SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 MarsdenLR 1776

CHONG SIEW FAI SABAH, SARAWAK, EDGAR OSEPH R, SHAIK DAUD ISMAIL
GANAPATHY RENGASAMY – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Chong Siew Fai CJ (Sabah & Sarawak):

At the conclusion of the hearing before us, and after a short deliberation, Edgar Joseph Jr FCJ and Shaik Daud, JCA allowed the appeal, quashed the conviction and set aside the sentence of death. I differed from them with regret. We indicated that reasons for our different conclusions would be given. I now give mine.

I do not propose to repeat the history and the facts of this case, which have already been clearly rehearsed in the judgment of Shaik Daud, JCA.

For convenience, I shall call the appellant "the accused".

Grounds Of Appeal

Altogether there were eight grounds of appeal as follows:

(A) The learned trial judge erred in:

(a) convicting the accused under s. 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (the Act);

(b) convicting the accused since there was no clear, direct evidence showing that he had knowledge, custody and control of the drugs;

(c) failing to consider that the existence of a 3rd party, one Abdul Rahman bin Noh alias Ah Kiong, who was also arrested on a charge of drug trafficking, had created a doubt in this case;

(d) failing to consider Mohamad Radhi bin Yaakob v. Pendakwa Raya [1991] 3 MLJ 169 SC;

(e) failing to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top