SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 MarsdenLR 86

COURT OF APPEAL , PUTRAJAYA
KEMENTERIAN PERTAHANAN MALAYSIA & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
MALAYSIA INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION BHD & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Zaleha Zahari JCA:

[1] The appellants were insured by Perdana Cigna Insurance Bhd ("the insurers") under a Marine Open Policy against loss or damage arising from all shipping and sendings on or after 20 October 1992. The policy issued by the insurers was at all times a contract of indemnity. The policy, inter alia , included a subrogation clause, that at the request of the insurers, the appellants shall subrogate to the insurers their rights and claims against others and permit a suit to be brought in the appellants' name at the insurers' expense.

[2] By letter dated 23 February 1995, the appellants submitted a claim in respect of damage caused to certain equipment on 19 April 1994 during the carriage/transportation from the ship on discharge to the terminal for storage pending delivery to the appellants, as consignee. Letter dated 4 April 1995, minutes of meeting held on 4 April 1995, letter dated 27 April 1995 to GEC-Marconi Projects (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd and letter dated 2 August 1995, show that the insurers admitted the appellants' claim. The settlement arrived at was that the damaged equipment would be replaced by the supplier, GEC-Marconi Projects (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. ("G

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top