SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 4411 ; 2009 MarsdenLR 1

SURAYA OTHMAN
SIAH TEONG WOEI – Appellant
Versus
JANET TRAYNOR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Suraya Othman J:

Introduction

[1] This is an application of the respondent by way of summons in chamber in encl. 19 under O. 18 r. 19(1)(b), (c), and (d) Rules of the High Court 1980 ("RHC 1980") praying for the following order:

(1) that the petition herein be struck off;

(2) that the proceeding herein be dismissed with costs to be paid by the petitioner to the respondent;

(3) that the costs to and connected with the application herein be paid forthwith by the petitioner to the respondent; and

(4) for such further order or relief deemed fit by this honourable court.

[2] The respondent in her application laid down reasons and grounds for the application which are among others:

(a) that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 18 August 1989 in Weybridge, Surrey, England;

(b) that the respondent had presented a divorce petition in the Family Division of the High Court in England vide Matter No. KT05D00693 on 14 September 2005;

(c) that save for issues relating to the division of assets and custody of the child of marriage Darren Siah Li Xiang that remain outstanding, a decree nisi was ordered on 12 July 2007 in the English proceedings;

(d) tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top