COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SISTEM PENYURAIAN TRAFIK KL BARAT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KENNY HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
Appeal
[1] On 16 July 2008, by a majority decision (Nihrumala Segara a/l MK Pillay JCA, dissenting) we allowed the appeal by the appellant Sistem Penyuraian Trafik KL Barat Sdn Bhd ("SPRINT") against the decision of the learned High Court judge who had dismissed the appellant's application for leave to intervene in a land reference in which the first respondent, Kenny Heights Development Sdn Bhd ("Kenny Heights"), had objected to the quantum of compensation awarded by the second respondent, the land administrator of the Federal Territory ("the land administrator") for compulsory acquisition of Kenny Height's lands.
[2] Having granted SPRINT leave to intervene, I now give my grounds.
Factual Background
[3] Kenny Height's lands were acquired on 17 February 2000 by the land administrator for the purpose of building the public highway known as SPRINT Highway ("the Highway").
[4] SPRINT's affidavit in support refers to and annexes the relevant portions of the privatization agreement entered into on 23 October 1997 between SPRINT and the Federal Government ("the privatization agreement") appointing SPRINT as the concessionaire of the Highway.
[5] Pursuant to the privat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.