SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 MarsdenLR 488

FEDERAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
NG HOCK CHENG – Appellant
Versus
PENGARAH AM PENJARA & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Gurbachan Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Abdul Wahab Said

JUDGMENT

Peh Swee Chin FCJ:

[1] We have earlier dismissed this appeal and indicated we would give our reasons later. We hereby do so now.

[2] The appeal was against the order of the Court of Appeal confirming an order of High Court at Ipoh which had earlier dismissed the appellant's writ action for declarations that his dismissal as a chief store keeper of the Prison Department be declared void; and an enquiry be heard into arrears of salary etc.

[3] Summarising the facts which were not disputed; briefly the appellant joined the government service in 1960 and rose to the rank of chief store keeper at the detention camp at Kamunting, Taiping at the time of his disputed dismissal. According to the appeal, he had incurred heavy debts in trying to assist his father in the latter's bicycle business, that being pursued by creditors, he sought the advice of one Dato' Ibrahim, the head of his department who advised him in effect to present against himself a bankruptcy petition as a debtor for an indebtedness to the tune of more than RM300,000.

[4] It is to be borne in mind that under the former Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) (Chapter D) General Orders 1980 applicable to the present ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top