SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2723

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TAN KIM HOCK PRODUCT CENTRE SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
TAN KIM HOCK TONG SENG FOOD INDUSTRY SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. scope and application of trade descriptions act. (Para 1 , 6 , 7 , 13)
2. concern over 'halal certification' of products. (Para 12 , 14)
3. legal arguments against ex parte orders. (Para 17 , 18)

[1] This appeal centres on the scope and application of s 9 of the Trade Descriptions Act 2011 which empowers the High Court to declare an infringing mark as a false trade description. An order obtained under the aforesaid section, called the Trade Description Order may subject a trader using such infringing mark to prosecution under s 5 of the same. A Trade Description Order was obtained by the respondent in this appeal.

[2] As a background, it would be useful to narrate the facts leading to this appeal in the following chronological order as stated before the learned High Court Judge.

[3] The respondent was incorporated in Malaysia in 1975 with its business address at No 153, Wisma Tan Kim Hock, Jalan Laksamana Cheng Ho, Malacca. It was established to manufacture, process, distribute and sell the respondent's products, which products include 'dodol' products.

[4] The founder of the respondent was Mr Tan Kim Hock, who together with his late wife, created the durian dodol, c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top