SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 1380

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KUCHING
HOCK PENG REALTY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TING SIE CHUNG @ TING SIEH CHUNG – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of the case and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. defendant responds to the plaintiff's claims. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's analysis and conclusions on legal principles. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
Rhodzariah Bujang J:

[1] The plaintiff is a well-known property developer in Sarawak with both housing and commercial projects in most of its major towns. Its Managing director, Datuk Toh Chiew Hock was in fact named as Sarawak State Entrepreneur for 2007. The defendant is an advocate who practised in the firm of Messrs. Ting & Ting Advocates. Way back in 1989, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement to develop the defendants land in Bintulu described as Lot 16 Kemena Land District ("the development agreement"). Under the development agreement, the defendant as the landowner was entitled to 26 units of houses developed on it. The plaintiff contended that a sum of RM250,000.00 was advanced to the defendant in order for him to discharge the charge on the land with Kong Ming Bank but the defendant defaulted in repayment of the said advance. The default led th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top