SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 MarsdenLR 706

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BINA PURI SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
EP ENGINEERING SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Philip Chai ,Respondent Advocate: T Sudhar

JUDGMENT

Gopal Sri Ram JCA:

[1] This is the judgment of the court.

2

[2] Malaysia Airlines System Berhad wanted to build a cargo complex at Kuala Lumpur International Airport, Sepang. That complex needed infrastructure works. On 3 December 1996, Malaysia Airlines System Berhad awarded the contract for the infrastructure works to a joint venture constituted between the appellant and the second respondent in the instant appeal. On 29 January 1997, the second respondent in this appeal wrote to the first respondent. In that letter, it awarded the sub-contract for certain works in respect of the cooling system for the cargo complex in question. The appellant did not sign the said letter of award; nor was it ever mentioned in that document. Later, disputes arose which became the subject matter of proceedings in court. The first respondent before us was plaintiff in those proceedings and the appellant and the second respondent among others were defendants. That litigation was settled. The compromise was recorded in a settlement agreement dated 12 January 1999. s 1.02 of the recitals to the settlement agreement reads as follows:

By a letter of intent dated the 11th day of December, 1996 and a l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top