LIKAS BAY PRECINCT SDN BHD vs BINA PURI SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 MarsdenLR 3013

COURT OF APPEAL KOTA KINABALU
LIKAS BAY PRECINCT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BINA PURI SDN BHD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Lim Pitt Kong ,Respondent Advocate: Michael Chow

Table of Content
1. factual basis for the winding-up petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. winding-up petition based on adjudication award. (Para 8)
3. core arguments from the appellant regarding the petition. (Para 9 , 10)
4. court's discussion on relevant legal provisions and case law. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 30)
5. critical judicial findings regarding adjudication enforcement. (Para 16 , 26)

Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim JCA:

Brief Facts Of The Case

[1] Bina Puri Sdn Bhd ("the petitioner") obtained an Adjudication Award dated 31 December 2016 ("Adjudication Award") against Likas Bay Precinct Sdn Bhd ("the respondent") in the matter of an adjudication conducted pursuant to the Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration Rules ("KLRCA Rules") and Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA 2012") for the certified sums amounting to RM16,439,628.24.

[2] The petitioner served a Statutory Notice of Demand dated 31 January 2017 ("the Statutory Notice") pursuant to s 465 of the Companies Act 2016 (" CA 2016") together with its letter dated 31 January 2017 on the respondent at its registered office in Kota Kinabalu.

[3] The pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 MarsdenLR 3013

COURT OF APPEAL KOTA KINABALULIKAS BAY PRECINCT SDN BHD – AppellantVersusBINA PURI SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

COURT OF APPEAL KOTA KINABALU
LIKAS BAY PRECINCT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BINA PURI SDN BHD – Respondent