COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MOHD RAFIZI RAMLI – Appellant
Versus
DATO SRI DR MOHAMAD SALLEH ISMAIL & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendant's appeal on damages and defamation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on public interest in defamation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's assessment of fair comment and privilege. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. judgments on the applicability of defenses. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. final judgment on appeal outcome and conclusions. (Para 10 , 11) |
[2] In the instant case the 1st plaintiff had made an application for loan for the purchase of eight units of offices, with the strength of money deposited in the account of the 2nd plaintiff, which money has nexus to Government funding. When the 1st defendant made the statement, he was not aware that the application for the loan was cancelled by the bank and/or did not proceed. This fact was also not brought to the notice of the 1st defendant until the plaintiffs commenced the action.
[3] The brief facts and the grounds of decision of the learned judge have been placed in a rudimentary manner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.