SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 74

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LIEW KET BOH & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Goldam Hamid ,Respondent Advocate: Zaki Asyraf Zubir

JUDGMENT

Ravinthran Paramaguru JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the High Court that allowed the application of the Public Prosecutor to forfeit monies in bank accounts belonging to Liew Ket Boh, Kenny Liew Ket Weng (Kenny Liew) and two others, namely Centrowest Trading and Sun Construction. The application was made under s 56(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (the AMLATFPUAA). Centrowest Trading and Sun Construction did not contest the application of the Public Prosecutor. Liew Ket Boh and Kenny Liew opposed the application. The High Court allowed the application of the Public Prosecutor. Now, Liew Ket Boh and Kenny Liew who were the third and 4th respondents in the High Court have appealed against the forfeiture order made against the monies in their seized bank accounts.

Affidavit Evidence Of The Public Prosecutor

[2] The brief background facts summarized from the grounds of decision of the learned High Court Judge and the affidavits filed by the Public Prosecutor are as follows.

[3] One Ferdinand Fascol complained that he lost the money that he had invested in a scheme initiated by an enti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top