SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 MarsdenLR 362

SUPREME COURT KOTA KINABALU
SABAH BANKING EMPLOYEES UNION – Appellant
Versus
SABAH COMMERCIAL BANKS ASSOCIATION – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Abdul Hamid Omar LP:

The question we shall have to decide in this appeal is whether the High Court properly entertained the motion for certiorari to quash an award from the Industrial Court. In determining the question it is necessary for us to consider the proper approach the Court below should take in exercising its supervisory role in regard to an Industrial Court award which, in law, is somewhat protected from full appellate review.

The appellant, Sabah Banking Employees' Union, represents non-officer bank employees in the State of Sabah. In 1985, labour contract negotiations were conducted between the appellant and the Sabah Commercial Banks' Association (the respondent) for a new collective labour agreement covering bank branches in that state. The parties reached agreement on all issues except the quantum of retirement benefits. During negotiations, the respondent proposed retirement benefits 15% of the employee's basic salary while the appellant had sought retirement benefits based on 15% of all wages, including the "Sabah Allowance", an allowance given to compensate for the state's high cost-of-living.

In July 1985 the parties signed a document embodying the agreed te

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top