SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 1660

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
WU SIEW YONG – Appellant
Versus
PULAU PINANG CLINIC SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Lim Boo Chang ,Respondent Advocate: Harjit Singh

Table of Content
1. plaintiff's medical history and initial treatment. (Para 1)
2. key issues of negligence and liability. (Para 2)
3. analysis of evidence regarding endometriotic cysts. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. negligence in the conduct of laparoscopy. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. use of zoladex injections in treatment. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
6. vicarious liability and employment relationship. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
Chew Soo Ho JC:

[1] Plaintiff consulted the 2nd defendant on 21 May 2001 with the history and complaint of pain in the abdomen before menstruation and dysmenorrhoea, inter alia. The 2nd defendant is an Obstetrician and Gynaecologist practising at the Gleneagles Medical Centre ('the hospital'), wholly owned and operated by the 1st defendant. Through an ultra sound scan, plaintiff was diagnosed clinically to have endometriotic cyst in her left and right ovary. She was admitted to the Hospital on 5 June 2001 for surgical procedure called laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. On 6 June 2001, 2nd defendant performed the laparoscopy on the plaintiff to confirm the presence of the two endometriotic cysts and forthwith to remove them. After the laparo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top